Why is it that ethnic mixing in an historical context is always framed as rape?
Is it to persevere the notion of feminine virtue and loyalty?
Look, if you know female nature, then you know they love conquers and despise the conqured. So in all likelihood pretty much all of he historical race mixing was consensual sex.
End the rape baby meme. It harms actual academic research, in the name of blue piled feels and shit.
>>2598761
The rapebabby bullshit is just a /pol/ meme, but you're kidding yourself if you think it was consensual in "fuck yeah foreign alpha studs" sense rather than "better find a hubby among the invaders so he'll protect me from his fellows" sense.
Did you come from r9k?
>>2598948
Most women are based af they don't care they watch brutal fight videos for fun.
>yfw your family is ancient as fuck and raped half the planet
Rape by definition has been redefined by feminists to include something like "sex due to power status of male" or something to that affect
So a master having sex with a perceptibly willing slave would by default be rape due to her submissive status
Even though it's clear that this isn't much different than any other case of women having sex with a powerful superior due to what is natural female attraction for power and superiority
>>2599148
>listening to women
Haha why would you ever do this
>>2598761
Because then you run into the situation where a nonwhite conqueror lays with a conquered white woman, and we can't have that as anything but rape you see.