Please give me your opinion of Zeitgeist - The Movie.

Okay pff. Didn't know where this would have gone. But luckily you guys ignored this. I hope because you either know it and find it ridicilous or haven't seen it. In that case, don't bother. :)

>>2575680
>>2575680
t was my first introduction to anything other than capitalism so thats a plus

>>2575680
I found tzm when I was looking for something to describe my political views.
I think they are overly critical of markets, pretty much wright about the problem but missed the solution. Haven't watched the movie. I've incorporated the natural law/resource based theory of value into mutualism

>>2575680
it's real fun to watch i like the i dunno the presentation or the format i'd like more docus like such as

>>2575680
>open you're eyes sheeple: the movie

It's great for 15 yo who want to sound smart and think they're better than everyone, like I was

>>2575680
all I know is that the christ-myth stuff it pushes in the beginning has been debunked

>>2576346
probabley rightfully so, but the first part at least sheds an interesting light on religion as a whole (just leaving the 'vehicle' aspect controlled by the unknown dark elite out of the equation).
The 9/11 part, has been debunked as well. But this sheds a interesting light on government transparncy (which was, if I may speak for Americans, with regard to 9/11 nowhere to be found?)
After that part, he totally loses himself in his own conspiracythinking, I belief.

>>2576279
Nice, don't let it be your first introduction to anything other than (whatever) :)

>>2576346
linku?

>>2576341

even when I was a 17 year old weirdo, I still thought this movie was dumb. It actually broke me out of that mindset of "IM 16 YEARS OLD AND SMARTER THAN YOU BECAUSE I WATCH THE DAILY SHOW! BUCK FUSH xD!!"

>>2576383
The first part about religion has been debunked though. So what makes the parts of the movie viable when they fucked up the beginning?

File: 14.15.png (51KB, 310x203px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 310x203px

didn´t watch it lol

>>2575680
>If you've just seen it, but haven't read about it, or just read about it but haven't seen it, I advice you to do your homework first.
Joke's on you, I have done neither.

>>2575680

Just read this.

http://skepticproject.com/articles/zeitgeist/

It goes through a ton of the fallacies and just outright incorrect information Zeitgeist puts out.

>>2576346
>all I know is that the christ-myth stuff it pushes in the beginning has been debunked

Which is pretty funny tbqh, because they didn't even have to lie for anyone with a brain to see the obvious connections between Sumerian, Ancient Egyptian and Abrahamic religion.

>>2576955
It wasn't any fuck up, it was a pants on head retarded fuck up.

>>2577031
>Believes Zeitgeist the Movie is a documentary.

>>2576383
>The 9/11 part, has been debunked as well
No it hasn't

>>2577045
Where did I say that?

>>2577058
>because they didn't even have to lie for anyone with a brain to see the obvious connections between Sumerian, Ancient Egyptian and Abrahamic religion.

Exactly what Zeitgeist proposes.

>>2576346
>>2577063
Other than some christfag talking up how dumb it is, it hasn't been "debunked" by any means.

>>2577063
No, the parts about Jesus being literally taken from other religions is obviously wrong.

But the idea of a savior that is supposed to ultimately destroy evil and chaos and bring about a glorious kingdom, is literally one of the oldest mythological ideas ever.

>>2575680
Very entertaining. I'd call it second only to spirit science in terms of retarded conspiracy kino.

>>2576955
the only viable thing I guess, is that the holy scriptures or texts got personalised. His interpretation is as real to him (the maker of the film) as god is to a religious person. (or what ever your view of the world is). This doesn't make it true or less mad or far fetched.

The content isn't valid, but the form sheds a light on religion (belief, truth) as a whole.

That, I find, is interesting. Viable, dangerous if let loose.

>>2577021
Yeah I know, just wanted to see if there are people here who would this in totallity or partialy to be true. I find it farfetched and a wee bit crazy.

>>2577049
well, sure. A - not so very much as in totally not about this subject- transparant government keeps the suspicion alive. And the truth is always unatainable in this context.

Debunked, not debunked, I simply don't know.

>>2577112
hahaha, it shouldn't come as a shock that it didn't make theaters (I hope). It is on netflix though.