What's /his/'s opinion on this ?
I dont like it.
>>2562258
I like it.
Crash Course 2: Squeaky Voice Edition
>>2562253
It's ok for someone just diving into history, think it's a bit of a overstep to call their re-cap lies seeing that it's mostly fuck ups on their part.
props for making episodes about relatively obscure stories
>/his/ hates crash course due to oversimplification
>/his/ likes extra history even though it still suffers from oversimplification, but also gets a lot of shit wrong.
I like it but they get so much wrong. Their lies episodes are nearly 20 minutes
>>2562253
I don't like it because it's popular.
It's entertaining, that's for sure. Doesn't give off a pretentious feel unlike some other YT channels.
They bring up stuff I've never heard of before and in that regard I use them like I'd use wikipedia: get basic knowledge of an event/thing, then read more in depth later from different sources.
Good on them for actually caring enough to acknowledge they're wrong at times.
>>2563047
the people that like EH also like CC
as for the people who don't, chances are they are not fans of EH either
besides Extra History admits their errors
>>2563047
>>/his/ hates crash course due to oversimplification
i though it was because Green is a leftist retard
>>2563047
Dan and James don't put "this machine kills fascist" on an apple laptop.
>>2562253
Can you guys do a series on Alexander? And please don't be a fag like John Green who shockingly made it all about women and spent the entire video shit talking a historical figure for having a penis.
>>2562253
Too childish, the squeaky voice really shows its target audience. It presents history more like plays or a story book, especially the ww1 videos. Now there's nothing actually wrong with having it child friendly, it gets kids into history and the channel is decently interesting.