Solution to the Race problem?

File: 392px-African_Pigmies_CNE-v1-p58-B.jpg (59KB, 392x599px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 392x599px

>>2561405
>African is one race

File: arch.jpg (16KB, 343x484px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 343x484px

East Asians are extra Neanderthal.
/pol/ really struggles to comprehend this and they get massively upset if you try to tell them that Europeans aren't descended from Neanderthal women who had sex with African men.

>>2561405
What are non-Eurooean caucasoids and why are they so near genetically speaking to Europeans?

>>2561405
> Africans all one race
> New Guineans all one race
> Indians either don't exist or are the same thing as SE Asians
> MENA doesn't exist or is non-European caucasian

Is race the biggest spook to exist?

File: Human_evolution_chart-en.svg.png (34KB, 325x358px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 325x358px

>>2561443
Asians are homo erectus

File: DUsRB6l.jpg (81KB, 1125x516px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1125x516px

>>2561451
The classic meme image

Yes racists ACTUALLY believe these people are related

>>2561421
yeah but it's the best we have

>>2561460
How are they not related?

>>2561452
>calling race a spook
>forgetting biology exists

yes indians are SE asians

what is the proble with non-european caucasoid

>>2561463
Sharing a single trait which could have arisen in genetically disparate populations via convergent evolution is not a grounds to create one race and to say that all these people are closely related. Not to mention this classification is from the 1920's before there was any DNA testing and people keep repeating it like it is a fact

>>2561460
the only differance is like skin tone and some other shit speaking genetically

File: 7ae33cba74279d2f9cf8c67b2eefe0ff.jpg (32KB, 500x668px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x668px

>>2561483
No

>>2561463

All humans are related.
But Caucasoid race has been debunked as a coherent ancestral group.

It's largely a fusion of two very distinct groups, one of which was more closely related to Asians(called West Eurasian) and the other broadly related to all Eurasian populations(Basal Eurasian) but closely to none since it was the first to split off after the out of Africa event.

All modern day "Caucasoid" populations have a mixture of West Eurasian and Basal Eurasian DNA. Europeans less Basal, Middle Easterners more Basal.

>>2561479
So northern europeans arent related to southern europeans? Alright got it

File: 4cce2a52-46e3-4791-8e65-435f682d15b2.jpg (70KB, 639x480px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 639x480px

>>2561479
>Not to mention this classification is from the 1920's before there was any DNA testing and people keep repeating it like it is a fact

My image was made in the 90's

having simmilair skull structure isn't just a trait

>muh convergent evolution

I make a distinction between european-cauc and non european-cauc

>>2561473
Are you implying that Indians are of the same race as Indonesians, Thai people? That's beyond retarded to even suggest. I think India is a combination of races that is too difficult to generalize.

>>2561488
Nice strawman

Northern Europeans and Yemenis most certainly aren't in one family nor are they close genetically

>>2561494
>having simmilair skull structure isn't just a trait

It literally is. Just one of several, like limb proportion, nose width and skin tone etc. Not anything to create one giant race over like 19th century pseudoscience would suggest

>>2561512
Well you didnt say which one of these are related and which ones are not. But go ahead and give us YOUR arbitary classifications.

>>2561405
Notice how blacks are conveniently separated from the rest.

>>2561524
People who are geographically closer without any physical barriers will be closer to each other than people completely far away, even if these people have different skull shapes. Hence I have no problem stating East and Northern Europeans are close to each other

The problem arises when people (racists) make the claim that an Ethiopian is actually closer to a Nord than other Africans because they have a Nordic skull shape. In fact, some East African groups are actually even less prognathous than any Euros. Guess West Africans and Euros and closer to each other than any of the two to East Africans? It just doesn't work

4 races are more accurate:

>Caucasians
>Asians
>Africans
>Literalwhos

>>2561405
There are seven races

Caucasoid:
Europe
Middle East
North Africa
India
Russia

Mongoloid:
East Asia
Pacific Islands
American Natives

Congoid:
Sub Saharan West Africans

Afrasoid:
Ethiopians
Original Somali
Original Sudanese
Original Saharan dark africans

Australoid:
Aboriginal
Tasmanian Pygmy
Phillipine Negrito
Native Indonesian
Papuan
South Indian native
Sri Lankan Native
Various Pacific islands

Pygmoid:
African Pgymy

Capoid:
San bushmen

Followed by hybrid races

Cauca-Congoid:
American blacks
Moroccans
Eritreans
European negro slave descendents

Cauca-Mongol:
Mexicans
Cubans
Central Asians
Colombians
Venezuelans

Cauca-Australoid:
Most Indians today
Any mix breed of Abos and Aussies

Mongo-Congoid:
Guyanans
Some Caribbean countries
A small percent of Brazil

Mongo-Australoid:
Some parts of Indonesia

Congo-Australoid:
Andaman natives
Sentinelese natives

Congo-Capoid:
Some parts of Southern Africa

Congo-Afrasoid:
Current Somali
Current Saharan Blacks
Current Kenyans

Congo-Pygmy:
Congo Africans

Cauca-Mongo-Congoid:
The most common human in Brazil.

>>2561586
>Moroccans
>Eritreans

how are these Congoid?

If anything Caucasiod-Afasoid from that list

>>2561545
So greeks are cliser to turks? And spaniards are closer to Morrocans?

>>2561607

Spaniards are distinct from Moroccans because they have very different levels of Sub-Saharan African admixture.
Spaniards are only 3% but Moroccans are 15-30%.

File: take off teeth face reac.jpg (62KB, 421x421px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 421x421px

>>2561473
>yes indians are SE asians

>>2561586
You missed the eighth

Retoid:
You

Which race would you pick if it was a high fantasy RPG?

>>2561725

Depends on the era

Right now, Jews are the planetary masters.