Solve this paradox:

>>2560361
There are lies which happen to be true.

>>2560361
The statement being referred to is a lie.
If it's self referencing, then it is still a lie because it would be 'true' and hence actually a lie.

>>2560365
so the statement was correct and telling a truth, then?

>>2560444
Truth content is irrelevant to whether a thing is a lie or not. Whether it is a lie is based solely on the intent of the claim maker.

>>2560450
so by your definitions, let's say the claim maker was intending to lie. wouldn't that make this claim true, contrary to his intention?

you don't get to decide that