How would white people look without the Neanderthal Gene?

Exactly the same

>>2550662
The same, there is barely any neanderthal in white people, its called convergent evolution you fucking retard.

>>2550667
aren't white people around 2 percent neanderthal?

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/neanderthal/

>>2550665
>>2550667
Lol no 2% is quite significant on a genetic level. Humans and pigs share 98% of the same genes.

That little 2% makes all the difference.

>>2550662
Weren't neanderthals supposed to be smarter than we are, but less efficient?

>>2550696
>to smart too win species war

>>2550696
they had bigger brains as us with around the same mass so they were probaby smarter

what is "the neanderthal gene"? wouldn't asians have it too as all non-africans have like 2-3% nea ancestry

>>2550700
wonder how far back before the patriarchies become neandertal?

>>2550708
dumbp

>>2550672
more like 0.03 percent dumbass.

>>2550678
According to scientist the only things neanders gave us were back problems and mental illnesses.

>>2550735
source

>>2550740
source

>>2550735
That's wrong though

>>2550662
there is no evidence that we got anything substantial from archaic mixture. plus, contrary to popular belief, lots of groups have neandarthal mixture, not just whites.

the different ethnic groups we see are all a result of natural selecton and gene-culture co evolution. thats it

>>2550672
>aren't white people around 2 percent neanderthal?
so are all eurasians, not just whites. east asians have more neanderthal mixture.

>>2550735

Why are you being such a cunt? Everyone else having a legit conversation and here you are acting like a test.

There is no scientific evidence the neanderthals ever existed. It's just a conspiracy by the christcucks to fuck with your brain. Ignore it.

Neanderthal human crossbreeding is irrefutable.

>>2551064
wat

File: KANGZ.png (308KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 480x360px

>>2550662
No, we'd have an IQ of 60-75 like african niggers

>>2550662

There would be little difference. I have no idea: Maybe slightly stupider?

>>2550933

To be fair, that neanderthal mixture surviving would be an example of natural selection.

>>2551544
Not necessarily, if what survived were regions neutral to selection. Conversely, regions geatively affecting fitness semmed to have been bred out, e.g. on the X chromosome.

>>2551066
Neanderthal's are homo sapiens. If we can breed with it and produce fertile offspring we share the species. Otherwise no way I share a race with pygmies and abos.

>>2550662
>Would we be smarter like the asians but also weaker?
Asians have more neanderthal dna than Europeans.

>>2551621
Wasn't it shown that Asians (esp SEA) actually have more Denisovan ancestry?

>>2550700
This is completely possible though, it's actually quite common. Social sophistication trumps the intellectual faculties of an individual.

A Neanderthal might posses the intelligence to produce a tool that only 1/20 humans can but if that 1/20 humans produces 20 of said tools and distributes them to the other 19 (proto-specialisation) the Neanderthal has already lost his advantage.