What were his thoughts on Anarchism?

>>2547042
He had no use for anarchism or anarchists.

>>2547042
Like every person with a brain he realized Anarchism was cancer because without the state to control the man, the man destroys itself

He said the meaning of human life is to pursue self-discipline and art, in a state of war we can't have poetry, music, dance or art/culture in general

He figured anarchists were primarily motivated by resentment of power and success, and thus viewed them with contempt.

His ideals, however wound up being quite influential in anarchist thought (particularly individualist anarchism and post-anarchism) and it's really not hard to see why; his notion of the best ruling is ultimately not dissimilar to the anarchist notions of emergent leadership, and a society where everyone took his ideals to heart would ultimately become rather anarchistic in function (you can't refuse to follow the heard and then subvert yourself to the wishes of society).

>>2547084
His reservations about anarchism had very little to do with the feasibility of the system.

File: image.jpg (117KB, 609x890px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 609x890px

>>2547084
Yes anon, anarchism means chaos, goood baby

>>2547042
Nietzsche just needed some good weed in his life and he could've sorted all of his unsystematized thinking out..........

>>2547110
>a society where everyone took his ideals to heart would ultimately become rather anarchistic in function
So an impossible society? If you put two people in a room, one will always defer to the other.

File: 1489907044880.jpg (26KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 480x360px

>>2547970
>Implying humans without laws to punish them are trustworthy

Yea, thats why you lock your doors and windows every night, don't wander around unfamiliar places and want the right to own guns, because you can count that your fellow man will not try to usurp you when he got the chance right?

You are a smart boy

>>2548201
>wants the right to own guns
A right is just a promise to take Liberty away.
I very much enjoy to wander around strange places
Anarchism doesn't mean societal disorder, it's against the state and other hierarchal institutions, people still organize themselves

>>2548250
*a promise *not to take Liberty away

>>2547084
But who controls the state?

>>2547110
>a society where everyone took his ideals to heart
Were you not paying attention when Nietzsche was disparaging the "lower peoples"? Nietzsche intended his ideals to only be put to practice by a select group of Ubermensch aristocrats, not society in general.

>>2548250
>Anarchism doesn't mean societal disorder, it's against the state and other hierarchal institutions, people still organize themselves
So you're admitting that hierarchy is natural? There's always going to be someone who's stronger and smarter than others, and these superior people tend to find themselves becoming people of authority and power. Anarchism is a fantasy.

>>2548501
>Ubermensch
>aristocrats
bruh

>>2548512
Hierarchy is inherently weak because it marginalizes the abilities of people further down. In theory, an anarchist collective is the strongest type of group because it wastes the least. The reason why feudalism died off is because societies where everybody is literate beat ones where 1% are literate.

File: image.gif (15KB, 350x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 350x300px

>>2548512
The concept of Hierarchy is an anachronistic, subjective interpretation of node influence and network structure. In reality nature works in networks, multiplexical networks, where systems interact. This is something like the current understanding of how nature is organized. These multiplexs are hetracrchy, the systems are panarchal pic related.
the concept of hierarchy assumes that nature's interactions are formed to shape of power. Being that most powerful order the less powerful, and so on with layers. Completely out of line with the way contemporary scientific understanding of the way emergent systems are ordered and interact, check out the field of synergetics.
Hierarchy and its assumptions are trash dogma that have been a convenient concept for people to exploit the system they are in by allowing them to get and maintain power. It makes for unstoppable propaganda, property is worse.
The individuals only aquire unequal power because we govern ourselves in a way which allows for people to take the power, and agency of others, it is only people's complacency with the inherent flaws of our organization that keep them in place.
I belive we should govern ourselves as a complex adaptive system with Liberty for the individuals, like the way nature really works, not this hierarchy bullshit.