Is putting "reals" over your own feels a spook?

no, it's what all the post-modernists are doing

>>2545463
Are spooks a spook?

>>2545463

What is this spook meme?

[spoiler] I want to get involved [/spoiler]

File: renzo.jpg (331KB, 1269x1786px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1269x1786px

>>2545903
Ego-anarchist meme for /lit/posting noodlenecks to justify their lack of convictions. I think it's waned recently, though.
>dude morality is a social construct
>dude failed milk bar lmao
>dude grenades lmao

>>2545463
I would say yes

>>2545919
>I think it's waned recently, though.

Only because people have stopped seeing it as a meme and started to internalise the message. Egoists will take back 4chan from Christcucks, moralfags and poltards, not by engaging in wars of words, but by ignoring their pathetic, attention mongering existence.
Io Saturnalia!

>>2545930
> Egoists will
>Forming an identity with people who reject identity altogether
Sp00k

>>2545930
I think 4chan in true spirit has always tended towards egoism outside of the commie and natsoc larping

>>2545463
idk what "reals" are, but if you mean objectivity over feeling, yeah doing that is a spook.

however you also care about being coherent so you can't let your fear of spooks make you lose all ambition, conviction, drive, etc. since that'd make your spooks a spook

>>2545919
> meme for /lit/posting noodlenecks to justify their lack of convictions

>>2547863
> Forming an identity with people who reject identity altogether

this is pretty accurate but Stirner's work is best seen as a criticism of ideology and subservience rather than an argument against convictions or identity

the whole "building your identity around a meta-rejection of everything instead of using spooks as a lens to spot chains on your soul" meme misses the point