Who won the Hundred Years' War?
I dont know go to wikipedia
>>2541994
The judeo-marxist banking cliques.
>>2542002
this.
shut down /his/.
everything can just be read on wikipedia.
>>2541994
To be perfectly honest, it's stupid to lump them all together as one mega-war. The French won the last and my at decisive one though.
>>2541994
Scotland
>>2542006
kek
>>2541994
England obviously, because England don't lose wars
Seriously, name an actual war that England unironically lost. You can have all the time in the world teams
>>2542055
This. England won this war, they fucked the french pretty deep.
>>2542079
Yeah man, killing all the French Nobility so the King can inherit all the land fucked France up pretty good.
>>2542055
Anglo-Afghan war.
>>2541994
The War ended with a Valois King, not a Lancastrian one, so the French won.
But ultimately the French still lost, because they still lived in France, spoke French, and had German neighbours.
>>2541994
France. England lost all its French possessions and France became the preeminent power of Europe. Idk how you can argue the English won.
>>2542163
Anglo's refuse to believe they were only relevant for about 200-300 years
>>2542168
Anglos were most relevant from 1600 to 1945. After that, their global relevance has dwindled to cultural influences such as the Beatles and James Bond. They got JUST'd by the United States.
>>2542168
That's just not true, ever since Doggerland sank below the waves England has been at the front and centre of cultural, scientific and social revolution of the world.
Germany.
England lost so badly they had to start slaughtering each other over who got the blame for losing.
>>2542176
>1600
Just no.
>>2542116
Afghanistan still ended up as a British puppet state. The eternal anglo never loses.
>>2541994
you know who did you filthy frog