Producing academic writing: Tell us why, what, how and why not?
As for me, I'll just say thesis writing is a bitch.
You can always do what shitty people do and plagiarize 19th century books for your works
AND GET PAID FOR IIIIIIIIIIIT
>>2542107
One would think they are uploaded into those anti-plagiarization program databases?
>>2542146
nah nah you get around it by plagiarizing 1st graders
>>2542146
One would think... and yet, the book I'm talking about was published by a university press and won awards for scholarship.
yes I'm bitter
>>2542146
Just mix it up. Change words, update phrases, add novel content. It's too easy.
Not like superquantum computers are checking this shit yet.
I should be writing right now but I'm just browsing /his/ and downloading books I will not read until september.
>>2542547
>downloading books
which ones
>>2542563
Rise and Fall of Classical Greece.
Looking for something on Ancient Egypt.
Trying again to download Kagan's "Men of Bronze".
>>2542563
i have a plethora of pdf books on ancient egypt i could send you, if youd like.
>>2542619
>Kagan
>>2542635
Why yes, I could use some, thank you.
>>2542646
His classes on Greece on Yale courses are pretty comfy. That "Men of Bronze" book seems like something really interesting, but scihub can't get pass around it neither in jstor or muse.
>>2542258
You might as well write original content at that point
>>2542710
it's on arg
>Uploading multiple books to RefWorks
When it comes to social sciences, how old should your sources be at max?
I feel a tinge of irony if I cite a book from the seventies with "modern" in the tile...
>>2542910
people still cite durkheim, weber and other classical theorists so i don't see why someone from the 70s would be inappropriate to cite
>>2542930
Good point.
One should however be very careful on wether or not the things said in the cited text are still applicable to the subject at hand.
What with postmodernity (or, heaven forbid, post-postmodernity) and all that.
>>2542816
arg?