How do we solve the Munchhausen trilemma?

>>2541951
Can we even prove that the Munchhausen trilemma exists?

>>2541965
Well, the description of it exists, and that's all we are really talking about.

>>2541980
>the description of it exists
Can we know this to be true?

Just accept infinitism

>>2541998
Self-refuting
>>2541951
The only way is to provide a strong foundation that is accepted on its own merits.

>>2542021
>Self-refuting
how so

you don't. you accept that all systems of logic are inherently flawed

>>2541951
Modest foundationalism.

Logic doesn't need to be proven to certainty in order to be useful as a model.

>>2541951
No truth actually exists.

I think therefore I am disproves the munchausen trilemma.

there are no axoims needed because you have direct empirical, unavoidable evidence that you are experiencing something and the very fact taht you are experiencing something means that the you which is undergoing experience exists(or at least as much of you requiered to experience sensation)

>>2541951
u cant rilly no nuffin

>>2543984
you are presupposing when "I" is though