No Aryan invasion ever happened.
>>2541066
The actual route was nothing like that.
Sintashta fortresses are at the Urals.
>>2541066
That's not even an accurate map
The Aryans rose from central asia after breaking off from the PIE and mingling with the cultures of Transoxiana
>>2541137
No. They came from Centra Europe. They were an early eastern extension of the Corded Ware culture.
>>2541137
alot of people understand the PIE as the same people as the Aryans, because of the misunderstanding in excavation sites
>>2541066
I mean I think its pretty clear that there was an invasion. Several figures in Indian religion are almost certainly not native to the subcontinent and are European in origin
>>2541160
The Aryans were not synonymous with Sintashta
>>2541264
Perhaps but even so they still have everything to do with people living in the vicinity of the Sintashta while nothing to do with say, the contemporary Iranians and Afghans.
>>2541066
The idea of aryan invasion was crafted during early days of scientific racism to promote a racial theory why whites came to dominate certain regions.
This was needed to support the colonialism mindset where the whites of the age were bringing civility to the uncivilized world.
>>2541342
>something sounds racist and shit so it must be wrong
Well to be factual, Aryan invaders didn't civilize anyoneone anywhere. They were not civilizers at all, they were a fighting and destroying people.
>>2541353
No "Aryans" ever existed. Sanskrit is indigenous to India. The Harappans spoke Sanskrit. Slowly over time the Sanskrit language started to leave India and made it to Europe along trade routes. That's how you learned it. You're welcome.
>>2541364
Nah.
Enjoy your fantasies while you can.
Harvard is studying Harappan DNA and they are gonna say that Harappans aren't Aryans.
>>2541353
The background premise of any fact must be understood to get the real knowledge. Facts out of vacuum are not useful.
Scientific racism was big in the last few centuries. Heck, Hitler was not a super special racist guy, most people were what we'd call very racist by today's standard. His belief about Jews/Aryan race were not drawn from vacuum, infact most people believed in the aryan superiority theory. The extremes he went through to put that belief into practice led to widespread disavowment of racial superiority theories.
>>2541364
t.Pajeet
>>2541066
Discuss
>>2541565
Nobody's a Stormfag here you retard.
The Aryan invasion can be discussed without braindead autismo about JOOOZ.
Besides, Jews have R1a-Z93 so they also descend from the Aryans to some extent.
>>2541066
You're a lying Dravidian cuckold Jew I bet.
>>2541583
>Nobody's a Stormfag here you retard
Sure, I bet it´s just regular folks here constantly posting Holocaust denial, Hitler threads and anti-Semitism.
>>2541596
>Dravidian Jew
I'm horrified upon imagining something like that existing
>>2541607
Most of the Hitler threads are either more legitimate discussion like how he rose to power and his effect on history or retarded shit like his testicles.
>>2541607
The Aryan invasion just happens to be interesting.
It's very interesting that a group of charioteers would always win their battles no matter who are where they were fighting.
>>2541583
Slavic bogatiri made love to jewish wenches during the annihilation of the Khazar Empire.
Now your people bear the mark of my ancestor's seed.
>>2541622
What the hell is a bogatiri?
Anyway, Z93 isn't Slavic.
Jewish Z93 probably descend from Zoroastrians who converted during the early Jewish phase.
>>2541633
>What the hell is a bogatiri?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogatyr
Not even him you uneducated faggot.
>>2541640
>baghatur
Okay so they are some Slavs LARPing Turks. Cool but unrelated detail.
>>2541642
It's a purely slavic word.
Bog - god. Turks are scythian rape babies anyway.
>>2541652
Pic related is proof it is slavic.
"Bogatyr" is used in the oldest context to mean a demigod. "Bog" means god in all Slavic languages, hence it is not turkic in origin.
>>2541679
>Baghatur (Mongolian: ᠪᠠᠭᠠᠲᠦᠷ Baghatur/Ba'atur (Modern Mongolian: Бaaтap Baatar), Turkish: Bağatur/Batur/Bahadır, Russian: Bogatyr) is a historical Turco-Mongol honorific title,[1] in origin a term for "hero" or "valiant warrior".
>The term was first used by the steppe peoples to the north and west (Mongolia) of China as early as the 7th century as evidenced in Sui dynasty records.[4][5] It is attested for the Göktürk Khanate in the 8th century, and among the Bulgars of the First Bulgarian Empire in the 9th century.
>>2541691
Turks and mongols are well known rape babies of Scythians.
Hence they share words with the direct descendants of Scythians, the Slavs.
>>2541757
>rape babies of Scythian
>annex central Asia from Scythian
you are getting ahead of yourself