Justify this, modern art fags.

I think it looks nice.

Why was Hitler so right about the jews and their art?

It got some billionaire a huge tax break, so it served its purpose.

>>2535562
The price tag has nothing to do with it and you should be asking an economist to justify it instead.

>>2535569
Hitler was just butthurt he couldn't make it into art school.

Money laundering confirmed?

>>2535562
Tell me, have you ever created a work of art which 47 years later made someone feel enough annoyance that they needed to anonymously post it on a Belorussian cheesemaking forum?

>>2535592
From what I've heard of artists he'd butt hurt if he got let in, too.

>>2535586
What would an economist contribute?
>Entity A was willing to sell product for certain price
>Entity B was willing to acquire said product for said price

Not the artists fault. Blame the greed of capitalists always trying to o e up each other on whi can afford the most absurd pointless shit.

>>2535605
Probably because his art was shitty and would have contributed nothing.

>>2535602
Legitimately great point.

t. OP

>>2535562
You can trash it all you want, but I bet you never thought of scribbling on a chalkboard or splashing paint on a canvas for art until it became a popular meme

Art, like evolution, doesn't get "better", it just changes.