Is love subjective or objective?

File: C.S. Lewis2.jpg (65KB, 368x473px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 368x473px

Objective.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AXi4-_HPRk

>>2530161
Why is Jean Grey looks so fat in that picture?

>>2530161
Niether, it's an abstractive concept. It doesn't exist. It's a spook.

Why do you think love exists in so many vaguely defined styles. It's just a way of saying you care for something a lot. Caring for something can be measured neurologically but all the implications of what it means to care and what it SHOULD mean to care, don't exist and never have.

>>2530161
Who's that woman? You're not implying they are together are you?

>>2530255
>Who's that woman?

Trump's smartest and ugliest ex-wife I think.

>>2530165

Why do so many stupid people cite this imbecile so often? Is he like a meme for stupid people or something?

>>2530289
>not knowing the greatest 20th century philosopher

kill yourself

>>2530331

CS Lewis was a fiction writer, not a philosopher. Although I guess the fact you think he was a philosopher is perfectly in keeping with how obviously stupid you are.

>>2530370

He's right though.

>>2530161

It's subjective and temporary. You only "love" someone until someone better comes along.

>>2530609
Are you a woman? That's how women think.

Love exists, that much is an objective truth. (Whether you see it as reactions in the brain or something a bit more 'spiritual' or both is a separate question.)

The question that needs asking is whether there can be objective love between two people (polyfags need not apply). To that: yes and no. You can love someone so much that your subjective feelings become your objective reality; you love that person as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow. But I would be wary of saying you were destined to love that person and by the same token that you cannot fall in love again/couldn't have fell just as much in love with another person.

>>2530165
What tripe.
This guy needed his hole something awful.

Obviously. Some mechanism in the brain is involved in the creation of such attachment. Psychologists and medical professionals have been studying it for a long time.

Scientific explanations still elude us due to the sheer difficulty of studying the brain. With a computer program, not only do you know how the machine works but you can also dump its full state, allowing you to predict and reproduce its next move. With the brain, your best option is to scan it with a non-invasive tool and see which areas are "active" in comparison with one another. You can't exactly just go and start cutting up other people's brains out of nowhere either, even when they're dead.

But just because we can't explain it yet doesn't mean it's not objective.

>>2530627
Obviously objective love can exist only between two men.

>>2530343
Philosophy falls within the realm of creative writing. Don't think that they are any better than fiction writers or vice-versa. Get off your high horse.

>>2531479
Yes, and that is called friendship. Women however are hypergamous beasts.

>>2530161
Surjective

Why not both??
>>2530161