What are the limits of rationalism and empiricism and why?
>>2515313
Without joking, it is your betaness, displayed by your choice to use a roastie for the thread.
>>2515335
say that to my face not online fucker see what happens
Definitions please.
>>2515313
Consult one Immanuel Kant
>>2515313
>Mistress T
I can't prove the existence of my imaginary friend with it so it's obviously too narrow minded for my great spiritual intellect.
>>2515893
My exact thoughts
None, it explains everything, only insane people think otherwise.
>>2515313
only rationalists believe that empiricism is limited
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction
>>2515313
It doesn't matter if we say the empirical world exists or not as it is in a permanent state of becoming.
As far as I'm concerned, my will is what becomes, so I might not exist.
The powers of the mind are limitless.
>>2515313
The imagination of men, and obviously because that's where both systems originated and end.
>>2515893
>that video of her fucking a black guy and making her girlfriend watch and lick her feet
>>2517290
>when the cuckquean jus rite
>>2517215
Becoming is a motion that only subsists from subject to subject. What-is-not cannot ever undergo becoming.
>>2517290
>>2517290
yeah betas can resist this
>>2515313
They cannot explain how my mind makes contact with reality.
See: The Problem of Reality
http://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/file%20uploads%20/sebastian_gardner_philosophy_guidebook_to_kant_abook4you.pdf