True Solipsism

File: Ludwig_Wittgenstein.jpg (265KB, 547x800px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 547x800px

>solipsism

>>2512079
What are you implying with this faggot?

>>2512090
Private language argument, pleb

>>2512110
Uhm I was speaking in english. Would you be so kind as to explain what a private language is to a pleb like me?

>>2512118
I'm too lazy. Go educate your damn self.

>>2512158
You could never prove me wrong anyway sweetie.

>>2512110
What if the interactions upon which my languages are based are an illusion?

File: 600full-jean-paul-sartre.jpg (17KB, 225x299px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 225x299px

>solipsism
Do you also believe there's an evil demon trying to deceive you by creating everything you experience?

>overwhelming evidence other beings like yourself exist
>"b..but it is not 100% certain, so I am the only person who matters"
real deep

>>2512328
I exist therefore others exist.

>>2512328
>overwhelming evidence other beings like yourself exist
Tonight I had had an overwhelming evidence I fucked a girl but then I woke up.

>>2512267
The idea of illusions is founded on the notion of privileging some ontological type over others for absolutely no reason.

>>2512382
Let me put it another way:
What if the representations with which I interact, thus creating the languages I use, have no "ego" behind them, but are purely representations, nothing more?

>>2512572
If you're trying to argue for solipsism, it's not working. Your questions amounts to, "What if solipsism was true?"

>>2512614
I'm not arguing for solipsism, I'm just saying that Wittgenstein fails to refute it.

>>2512667
You see, but your hypothesis there is actually solipsism, or maybe some sort of idealism, depending on where these representations (as you say) come from.