>It is still a matter of discussion among theologians whether the story is to be understood as an actual transformation of water into wine, or as a spiritual allegory.
>The more usual interpretation, however, is that this is a reference to the appearance of Jesus, whom the author of the Fourth Gospel regards as being himself "the good wine".
>The exact location of Cana has been subject to debate among scholars.
What the fuck? Nobody cares that one of Jesus's most important miracles is apparently MUH JUST A METAPHOR BRO? Scholars care more about Cana was than whether Jesus actually turned water into wine?
>most important miracles
ayy lmao
He used powdered wine. Powedered wine is an old jewish thing for traveling.
Since the powder is so much lighter than wine.
He tricked them, all his miracles were illusions.
>>2503365
yeah the only Miracle is how anybody could still believe this shit in the Modern Age.
>>2503368
>powdered wine
so he kool-aided their asses, huh
>>2503365
Name five of Jesus's miracles
>>2503360
>Biblical scholarship
>serious
Pick one and only one. Everyone know modern biblical scholarship is a load of bs. It's an exercise on who can contradict what the text actually says the most.
>>2503382
1. Resurrection
2. Walking on water
3. Raising Lazarus from the dead after 4 days
4. Feeding the multitudes with 7 loaves and 3 fish
5. Filling the fishermen's nets to bursting with fish
6. Healing the blind, lepers, and sick like 20 times
7. Endind the woman's 10 years of menstruation
Water into wine is some bullshit Jesus pulled at a wedding in one gospel, not really a big deal next to raising a rotting corpse
>>2503372
In more ways than one
>>2503425
>Endind the woman's 10 years of menstruation
wtf????
>>2503368
Pretty sure it was a common thing
>>2503425
Don't forget the Transfiguration.
>>2503425
Creating the entire universe John 1:3.