Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1489240274934.png (208KB, 730x626px) Image search:
[Google]
208KB, 730x626px
Just came up with a though experiment while taking a shit in Burger King earlier today.
Two pepes are looking at a burger.
Does the burger exist independently of their perception of it? That is, there is a single burger that is simply viewed through different lenses.
Or does the burger only exist within the context of their perceptions and therefore the burger cannot be defined outside the scope of an observer?
>>
The burger exists independent of your perception.
If nobody is in the room, the burger is still there. What kind of dumb question is this?
>>
>>2501768
WHAT IF a tree falls on the burger?
>>
>>2501773
Can you prove that?
>>
Something exists outside of perception, but "the burger" is a construct produced by brain within the context of perception. In other words, two Pepes are looking at the same "stuff" but seeing two different burgers.
>>
>>2501801
Cameras.
>>
We're assuming your description of the event is objective so yes the burger does exist independently because you state it does.
>>
>>2501855
But we can't prove that cameras exist if we can't see them.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1