Was he guilty?

>>2498838
Did this take place less than 25 years ago?
MODS!!

>>2498879
1992 during LA riots and Rodney Kangz

He dindu nuffin

>>2498879
Is 22 close enough?

File: thinking-face.jpg (7KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 256x256px

>>2498897
>>2498921
The murders were actually in 94 and the trial was in 1995, which was the most publicized part of the whole affair. I'm not actually going to report this though.

>>2498838
Even black people know OJ did that shit.

>>2498838
even niggers know he did it

>>2498838
He wasn't not guilty

If OJ wasn't framed, then why did Mark Fuhrman commit perjury?

>>2499270
Cause he planted the glove. Even if OJ did commit the murder (probably greater than 50% chance he did), the LAPD fucked with the evidence too much and the prosecution fucked up the case too hard, it would have been a breach of justice if OJ was convicted.

I'd rather have a system that occasionally lets guilty people go free than a system that occasionally convicts innocent people. In a country ruled by law, you can't just convict someone cause you know they did it, you need to have evidence that's legal and procedural. It's why if the police break into your house without a warrant and obtain evidence you did a crime, you can't go to prison even though there's evidence proving you did it.

The OJ case ended up more about keeping LAPD powers in check than convicting OJ, which if you think about it is more significant than one random murder case.

>>2498838
He did it.