>Blood relations to Byz*ntine emperors
>Official title is Kayser of Rum (Caesar of Rome)
>Owned Constantinople the seat of the Empire
>Recognized as the true successor to Rome by the Patriarch of Constantinople
Why does the West so venomously deny that the Roman empire fall with the Byz*ntines?
Rome fell in 1922.
I wouldn't call them "Rome's successors" but they are definitely the successors of the Byzantine empire. The only other country that was even remotely close to being the ERE's successor was the Russian Empire. However, that state fell in 1917. From march 1917 to 1922 the Ottoman Empire was the only true successor to the Byzantines.
6/10
need a longer name, a tripcode and pictures of cats
Bow dow to the true successor of Rome
>>2490984
Unironically this. The United States does Rome better than Rome did.
>>2490962
Because Sully the Mag was considered for election to Holy Roman Emperor, and as we all know:
>H
>R
>E
So no, by simple logic the Ottomans defaulted on their claim to Roman status.
>>2490992
How?
>>2490962
Bosnia is the one true Rome, and the one true Caliphate
>>2491084
World domination?