Seriously, did he actually do anything wrong?
define "wrong"
He lost, for one.
>>2480732
yes and youre intellectually cuckolded into thinking its worth worrying about your papa hitler, the writings of manson, etc, etc
>>2480761
Please explain
>>2480732
He was a vegan faggot.
He should have pursued his art career desu
>>2480732
The odinist bullshit was too far, he should have clamped down on it in the nsdap, and his brand of racialism was pseudoscientific at best.
He should have focused on building better relations with Russia instead of sperging out against his only real ally, starting a land war in Asia was suicide.
>>2480777
He was pretty bad at art though. For someone who cared so much about realism which was already outdated he couldn't even do perspective right.
>invaded russia instead of setting up a solid eastern defensive line
>letting the brits main army escape across the channel
>allying with two enourmous fuckups
hitler was good at rallying people but horrible as a commander.
t./pol/lack
>>2480778
Invading Russia to nick land from the Slavs was a key part of his ideology.
That's like saying "damn why can't this crazed ideologue have been a moderate real-politik centre right-winger".
A short German vegan homosexual painter with a mustache who pretends to be nordic master race.
He constantly meddled with his generals, fucking things up, thinking he knew better. He also had this "muh troops courage and tenacity will win the battle" notion, you know, rather than tactics and know how. Also during Stalingrad, when the 6th army was surrounded a break out attempt was totally possible and on the table for his commanders, but he said "muh honor, fight to the death" like a retard, basically condemning the eastern front. There is a bunch of other stupid shit he did too. Honestly you retards that idealize this egomaniacal retard just 9because he killed da joos, are fucking stupid.
>asking /his/ about Hitler
You're in Führer
>>2481153
good time