Was he right?
>>2470169
>Gibbon
OP, thy name is reddit
>>2470169
>Unironically reading Gibbon in the 2010s
Read some more, OP
>>2470169
Mostly outdated but it's still a good read.
>>2470169
No, he was very wrong. His reasoning is flawed and has been roundly savaged over the past two centuries.
>>2470175
>i don't like it so it must be reddit
>>2470169
He was the memester
>fake, explicitly non-Roman empire
>Makes the cover of a book about Rome anyways.
I've also seen this picture used for the sacking of Baghdad