Why have most civilizations distrusted women?

>>2461268

>twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.6231.pdf

Think about how that would work for a minute. I'll wait.

People used to have common sense before everything went to shit in the 20th century.

Thank G-d's chosen people.

>>2461268
For good reason.

File: IMG_3468.png (1MB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1136x640px

Because up until now, they couldn't have one of these!!!

>>2461348
*high fives self*

because men banded together to hoard power and there wasn't much women could really do about it

>>2461268
because women are untrustworthy

>>2461268
they like foreigners and foreign stuff

>>2461268
They didn't. Women were entrusted with certain things and men with others.

>In the north there is a beauty; surpassing the world, she stands alone.
>A glance from her will overthrow a city; another glance will overthrow a nation.
>One would rather not know whether it will be a city or a nation that will be overthrown.
>As it would be difficult to behold such a beauty again.
Truly makes one ponder.

Because women are emotionally unstable. They are like children.