Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
Anonymous
Kennedy assassination 2017-03-04 06:10:49 Post No. 2455198
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Kennedy assassination 2017-03-04 06:10:49 Post No. 2455198
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Zapruder-150.jpg (36KB, 572x436px) Image search:
[Google]
36KB, 572x436px
What do you think about this? I'm 50/50 about believing the official version, since it does not seem to make sense when you watch the zapruder film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU83R7rpXQY
The final bullet appears to hit at an angle that would be impossible when the shooter is behind JFK.
>>
Does it matter anymore?
>>
File: mapersmafdsnia.gif (48KB, 523x223px) Image search:
[Google]
48KB, 523x223px
It clearly looks like he is being shot from the front and right hand side, yet Oswald was directly behind.
Also the gun Oswald used was a piece of shit which could not reliably have made that shot.
>>
File: jack-ruby-shoots-oswald.jpg (46KB, 500x362px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 500x362px
Also very convenient this guy is allowed to stroll into a police station and shoot Oswald
>>
>>2455198
You know how when a muslim shoots up a place and people report 2 shooters when there is really only one?
Same shit during the JFK assassination. In the chaos, people probably thought there were two shooters and thought shots were coming from the grassy knoll.
>>
>>2455204
It was one of the pivotal events of the 20th century
>>
>>2455218
The majority of Americans today don't even know the political orientation of Kennedy.
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (46KB, 667x384px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 667x384px
>>2455217
If you actually watch the footage you see a bullet hit the front right side of his head and then his head goes backwards, which is not consistant with Oswald shooting him from behind.
Yeah maybe you could say it was an exit wound if he head went forwards, but the fact his head goes backwards obviously means he got hit from the front.
>>
>>2455236
Thats sad.
I think its something that should be properly examined since so much does not make sense.
>>
>>2455246
Most Americans aren't woke enough to understand the gravity of the CIA offing their own president. They don't care.
You'd mash their brains to pulp trying to bash the importance into their skulls.
>>
>>2455297
It might have been the Russians too though, and maybe that was covered up to prevent WW3. Nikita Khrushchev was removed from power a few months later, possibly a part of a coverup?
It could have been possibly the mafia.
It could have possibly been the CIA.
Or it could have possibly just been Oswald himself but I think that is the least likely scenario.
>>
>>2455198
Three shooters. Two fired. Oswald and one from the grassy knoll.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4