Führer

File: IMG_3271.jpg (136KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1136x640px

Why did he consistently show a bulge a little longer and fatter than his thumb swinging around his zipper area?

File: IMG_3384.jpg (87KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x1136px

Like why did he want to cover it up? If that was his salami, why wouldn't he just be proud to have it?

File: IMG_3244.jpg (44KB, 554x554px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 554x554px

Another view of the Fuhrer Furter.

Do you think maybe Hitler liked to cover his junk to make it harder to tell the difference between him and his doubles?

I wonder how much more he would have covered it or destroyed his few uncovered pictures had he foreseen how many people would obsess over it for years and centuries to come? Lol.

Too bad they didn't have iPhones in the 40's because he basically had to approve each picture before it could be developed

File: IMG_3265.png (1022KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

1022KB, 640x1136px

But I can still figure out more about the dimensions of his junk than I can about my own great grandfathers, isn't that sad?

Why the fuck do we continue to glorify Hitler? He brought nothing but death to dozens of millions of whites who could had kids and global white population today would be higher, nationalism would not be seen as negative.
There are literally thousands of great European leaders we should glorify but Hitler? Why? He gassed the kikes and in the process ravaged the West.

>>2434326
People glorify him because of what he would have created if he had won.

Because of what he would do if he won?

Destroy Slavic people? Orthodox faith? His ideas were retarded as modern neo-nazis are. He brought nothing but destruction to the Western civilization, giving time for other nations of the world to develop.

>>2434343
A civil war between his closest people.

>>2434326
Historians don't glorify him. In fact, they are surprised how average/below average he was. /pol/tards know nothing about history.

>>2434373
>A civil war between his closest people.
Please explain

>>2434378
They didn't like each other to say the least. And Hitler was actually the only thing loved by the people. Without him there was no NSDAP.

>>2434382
I'm pretty sure that Hitler and Goebbels would have left behind a legacy of propaganda that would keep the Germans united.

>>2434399
And who would be the second fuhrer? Goebbels and Goring weren't friends. And there was still Himmler and especially later Bormann.

>>2434429
All of the inner circle would be too old by the time Hitler dies, so he'd have to choose his own successor