Have any historians actually denied the holocaust?
What evidence do holocaust deniers use to back their claim?
Please keep your /pol/ shit out of this thread.
>>2428964
David Irving destroyed his reputation by championing holocaust denial, only to be BTFO in court and ultimately to have disavowed the idea in his later works.
It is extremely easy to find arguments if your genuinely curious, starting a thread here is unneccessary
look up "holocaust fake" on youtube or something
>>2428964
>What evidence do holocaust deniers use to back their claim?
First, they take a look at the sort of evidence mainstream academics, such as this
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html
And then shout "JOOOOOOOZ" really loudly.
>>2428964
>What evidence do holocaust deniers use to back their claim?
They claim you could never burn that amount of bodies. But when mad cow was rampant a few years ago we had no problem burning insane amounts of cows.
I think it's really based on the amount of Jews killed. I don't think people actually deny the holocaust -- that would be absurd.
>>2430798
>I don't think people actually deny the holocaust
sweet summer child
There is a lot of finding people who lied about being victims and pretending that discredits the whole thing.
As if people who claimed to have been in the World Trade Centre, but weren't, prove 9/11 didn't happen.
Usually what people "deny" is
the exact numbers
And the cause of death (they think the majority of jews simply starved becaause of limited supplies for example).
>>2430815
No holocaust "denier" deny that the holocaust happened. What they seek to revise is the overall number of jewish victims, which they claim is lower than the sacrosanct figure of 6 million, and the claims that homicidal gas chambers were used to exterminate the jews (they claim that jews died of harsh treatment).
The idea that holocaust "deniers" deny that a single jew died during ww2 is a strawman.