WASHINGTON D.C. - APRIL 11, 1865...

File: booth.jpg (152KB, 1020x559px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1020x559px

>(AUTISTIC SCREECHING)

>>2404159

Lincoln was personally a racist by modern standards, sure. He still led the country to restore the Union and crush the institution of slavery. What's your point?

>>2404170

>>2404159
>>2404163

>>2404159
>don't allow anyone to vote except the most intelligent and the dumbest

>>2404170

What's the difference between Lincoln and Pol Pot? Aside from the obvious, that is. Asian v white Marphan Syndrome.

Are they not both tyrants?

Did they not both commit auto-genocide? Is the only difference the higher number of dead in the Killing Fields? Is that not accounted for by more effective weaponry?

No, Lincoln did not "free the slaves".

He committed auto-genocide.

>>2404534
You know when you post like this

It becomes painfully obvious that you're newfag scum

Also, if anything, Grant and Sherman committed "genocide"

POTUS didn't have as much control over specific military action as the office does today

>>2404534
Neo-Confederacucks always have to resort to revisionism and extreme hypebole.

>>2404534
I wish Lincoln genocided the South, it would have saved America a lot of headaches in the future.

>>2404534
>freeing black people from slavery = auto-genocide
>Lincoln is LITERALLY Pol Pot

The fact that stormshills unironically think a post like this is smart and has a point never ceases to amuse me.

>>2404860
This desu

I wish nukes were invented before the civil war.

>>2404518
Serving your country means that you love your country, and truly wish the best for it, meaning you are likely to vote for things better for America.
>>2404159
I'd agree, but the problem is, how would we determine the smartest? A test? How can we guarantee it won't be skewed, so that one side gets unfair representation?