How much of this is bullshit?

>>2399486
Like nearly all of it

>>2399493
Seems pretty accurate to me.

>>2399486

Mostly accurate, there are holes to be picked with all of them (lots of strawmen in there) and the PTSD and Norman ones jump out as being particularly bad

it's right to identify a rout being when the majority of casualties were inflicted in a battle but to suggest it was universally 95% is retarded

>>2399486
>No sources
All of it for all we know.

File: file.png (132KB, 435x343px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 435x343px

>>2399486
Terrible grammar and embarrassing mistakes like pic related aside, I don't see what's wrong with it.

The PTSD one doesn't make sense though

Seems mostly fine, except this:

>a longbow could fire like a machine gun
>and bows still had a monopoly over guns on power, force, range, and rate of fire
>plate armor could easily block bullets