Can you/women take physicists seriously, when they don't even know Stochastics?
>>2394028
Only brailet grad students need to know the nuts and bolts of number-wrangling, real brainlords have more important things to occupy their neurocycles.
>>2394054
Don't get me wrong, both are important but Phycisists really tend to neglect stochastics in our evolution.
>>2394249
>Phycisists really tend to neglect stochastics in our evolution.
What work do physicists do in evolution?
And what do you mean, 'they neglect stochastics'? There are entire fields of physics that basically rely solely on the analysis of random variables or their generalizations, statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics being two examples.
Not to mention that stochastic numerical methods are very important in modern science.