Genghis Khan, how was this even a question?
>>2389062
>implying it was rape
>>2389065
Can't all have been consensual
>>2389132
Why not? He was, after all, a rich and powerful monarch from a part of the world where polygamy among the ruling class was pretty normal.
What's a good book on beria? Was he a literal sociopath / did he feel no empathy for others?
>>2389136
>I fucked and killed my way across the lands and destroyed everything you love
>want my peepee
No.
>>2389053
I'm sure there have been far worse, but the guy that killed 77 people is the worst rapist I'm familiar with. Rape = Assault: sometimes people assault/rape to death. They use all sorts of weapons, including their hands, feet, head, knees... They use guns, knives, poison, bombs, cars, trucks.
Or do you believe that someone who kills would not also rape? Or has not shown a tendency to assault people or animals: that could have reported, but was not?
>>2389136
>bothering with consent when you are a rich and powerful monarch with no checks and balances whatsoever
The better question is: Why ever ask for consent?
>>2391046
4/10 because you'll net some replies