Royals always ultimately always descend from a high IQ elite that managed to convince the dummies that they should rule way back when, who in turn descend from whatever high IQ chieftain managed to rule over whatever protocivs popped up.
Would you say this is controversial?
Not really. The "Divine right of kings" is also quite easily explained:
>Way back in the day, entire world is basically in a state of Anarchy
>Everybody is fighting everybody, no laws and no repercussions
>Eventually one guy arises who just kills everybody else because he is the baddest motherfucker around, and because he managed to convince the most warriors to join his cause
>That guy is the king, his kids inherit the title, and their kids, and so on
>Fast forward a few generations: Why is that guy in particular king? "Because God said so okay, don't fuck with that guy."
Yeah. because it is all high and relevant when someone akin to pic related ascends to the throne.
>>2379097
Actually the doctrine is derived from Romans 13, sorry for your poor education.
>high IQ elite
>they are in power because they were good at conversation :)
No, i'd say it's retarded.
>>2379084
IQ is a horrible measure of intelligence
Like bordering on totally useless
>>2379383
>IQ is a horrible measure of intelligence
t. low IQ
Say that to all the Jews in the academia and scientific Nobel prize winners and get laughed at, you sniveling pleb. There is obviously some sort of correlation.
Last summer, researchers at the University of Illinois revealed that most bees aren’t as busy as we give them credit for, and a small group of workers handles the bulk of the labor in a hive. Now, another research team has taken the famously industrious ant down a peg, showing that many ants don’t do their fair share of work—or any work at all.
http://m.mentalfloss.com/article.php?id=66789
>>2379084
how do you think Royals became Royal? At the tip of the sword, not in the pages of a book.
>>2379395
>some sort of correlation
welcome to the discusiion 50 years ago. pleae read the wikipedia page to start.
>cites nobel prize winners as an intellectual authority
Keep going, i'm having some keks
Truly the men that inspire legends.
>>2379468
They are both cute. Don't bully them please.
>>2379452
>welcome to the discusiion 50 years ago. pleae read the wikipedia page to start.
I've tried to put it in simple terms for your meager mind to comprehend, but it seems a futile task.
>cites nobel prize winners as an intellectual authority
>the average calculated IQ among the economists, physiologists, physicists and chemists is above 136
>Not a valid authority to show a direct correlation
Kill yourself senpai.
>>2379084
Fuck off with the IQ meme
Being socially apt is only one aspect of intelligence, and high IQ people are very often not well liked.
>>2379395
High IQ means you are good at logical thinking. Nothing more. It doesn't make you a good leader or speaker, it doesn't make you cunning, it doesn't give you social skills. Intelligence is the whole of many parts; someone might be good at numbers, but they might also be selfish narrow minded fools.
>>2379097
>t. Thomas Hobbes
>>2379318
>Implying he wasn't just pretending to be retarded
>>2379602
he was a pretty smart guy