What does /his/ think about this statement?

It's trendy culture war brainwashing.

>>2372488

>book of revelation

The apocalypse probably.

>>2372488
Terrorism will stop when the oil in the mid east runs out and causes western countries to stop fucking around in that region.

>>2372576

So in 500 years?

>>2372488
Overly optimistic.

>>2372488

Completely retarded

Tours/Poiters was not the first Christian victory against Arabs, and it was hardly a significant one, given that it didn't even settle the war going on in what's now southern France, let alone anywhere else; what macrohistorical impact it had, if any, would be in its prominence to the rise of the Carolingian dynasty and subsequent effects on France, not some larger aspect of a conflict between "Christianity vs Islam", which is of course a massive oversimplification.

Then there's a list of some other victories of Christian forces against Muslim ones. I would just like to point out that the Christian kings in the Reconquista often employed Muslim mercenaries, because clearly, it was some us vs them ideological conflict with no room for mixed loyalties or anything.

Terrorism is hardly restricted to Islam. Hell, the largest terrorist organization in modern times would be the now defunct LTTE, and they were primarily Tamil Hindus. And I have no idea on what basis he's claiming there will be a final victory over Islam in the next decade; and it certainly won't be a victory over a tactic for pursuing political goals.


It's pure /pol/tardation.

>>2372488
>The defeat at Poitiers was the first Muslim defeat at the hands of the Christians
Byzantium is ignored yet AGAIN
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Constantinople_(674%E2%80%93678)