Buddhism

>>2370493
Western philosophy is light years ahead of Buddhism in everyway

>>2370506
Bait

>>2370493
dharmapada, eknath easwarns version is good intro

>>2370574

Just because you don't like the people who follow it in the West or have done zero reading into the subject doesn't mean you can claim something so ignorant.

>>2370848
It's basically eastern stoicism with a different cosmology

File: 51kX6Oc9bYL.jpg (33KB, 328x500px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 328x500px

>>2370493
You should read pic related. You should also read the works of Alan Watts and D. T. Suzuki.

Also the Tao Te Ching.

Look into Theravada Buddhism for it is the sect that is the closest to the original teachings.

https://youtu.be/wJUJbKqtKb0

The Dhammapada is a good start

The Story of Buddhism by Donald Lopez is the best mix of history and philosophy at a survey level.

Early Buddhist Discourses by Holder is good

>>2370839
Eknanth Easwaran is trash, his version of the Upanisads is a fucking travesty

>>2370950
is it? would you just expand i have read his upanishads, and bhagavad gita, i dont know what better version would be, i tryed that hare krishna guys bhagavad gita, but it leaves a bad taste in my mouth

>>2370506
Found you Mara

>>2370493
Buddhism's mythology surrounding deities is probably the most interesting to read about.

The Middle Path is ment to serve as a guide instead of a hard rule. You are allowed to stray from the path, as long a you are willing fronm the consequences of your actions. Basically find a happy medium between Asceticism and gluttony/greed. Worldly pleasures are fine, but the weight they bear karmaically is proportionate to the amount of damage they do to your body, financal cost ect.

>>2371100
If you're still here - Easwaran translates a lot of really beautiful philosophical poetic writing into earthy crunchy feel good new age spirituality that really misses what makes the original Sanskrit really fucking beautiful. I would recommend Olivelle's translation and Radhakrishnan for the Gita.

Mani Rao has a super good "translation" but certainly don't read that one first.

>>2373085
(Same poster) My issue w Easwaran is that the way that he translates, in my opinion, misrepresents the Upanisads; it reads to me very much in the vein of liken "wow, India, so mystical, I took acid and now I'm a Hare Krishna" rather than as a really serious work of religious commentary and philosophy that forms the basis in many ways of ALL Indian philosophy

>>2370493
>there are a lot of versions of the Pali Canon
If you can read pali i advise you to buy links related

https://www.amazon.com/Digha-Nikaya-Long-Discourses-Buddha/dp/1479111929/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1487270960&sr=1-1&keywords=Digha+Nikaya%3A+The+Long+Discourses+of+the+Buddha+in+Pali+%28Pali+Edition%29
https://www.amazon.com/Majjhima-Nikaya-Middle-Length-Discourses/dp/1478369620/ref=pd_bxgy_14_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=GBT5DEFH9DB0DYC4NM3D
https://www.amazon.com/Samyutta-Nikaya-Connected-Discourses-Buddha/dp/1477614346/ref=pd_bxgy_14_3?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=GBT5DEFH9DB0DYC4NM3D
https://www.amazon.com/Anguttara-Nikaya-Numerical-Discourses-Buddha/dp/1479112003/ref=pd_sim_14_3?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=GBT5DEFH9DB0DYC4NM3D

>>2373111
>>2373085
thank you for your post, i had suspect easwaren's translation to be someone simplified and felt i was missing out, thank you for clearing it up for me, i will look into that translation of the gita, is their a prefred upanishads version that you would recomend, i had look at The Upanishads: Volume I : Katha, Isa, Kena and Mundaka by Swami Nikhilananda versions, but would much appreciate your recamendation, also have you read "Vasistha's Yoga", id also be interested if you know of any versions of that

>>2373129
Those are all in my library.
It should be noted, though, that those texts are only excerpts, and the same company that produces those books offers full Pali Canon collections that run 1k for non members and a little over 2 for members.

https://mega.nz/#F!AE5yjIqB!y7Vdxdb5pbNsi2O3zyq9KQ

>>2373085
>Radhakrishnan
is that S.Radhakrishnan or c.Radhakrishnan

>>2370848
he's not wrong. buddhism is incomplete compared to european philosophy. claims of objectivity of virtue and goodness in owning a set of "knowledge" that contains a lot of superstition and stoicism. the fact that it can be easily broken down by western philosophy is part of what makes it such a joke.

literally only interesting to larping white boys outside of it's home cultures.

Mahayana>>>>>Theravada

File: Comparaison.png (883KB, 1576x1050px) Image search: [Google]

883KB, 1576x1050px

>>2373768
>It should be noted, though, that those texts are only excerpts

I also have them, they lack the commentaries of Buddhaghosa(which are enormous desu) but they are complete.

Pic related is a comparaison of the complete Mettāsuttaṃ from http://www.tipitaka.org and the Mettāsuttaṃ from the book.

>>2373940
This, buddism is an irrelevant eastern religion which dumb white people flock to because it's 'exotic'

>>2373757
>>2373790
No worries m8, the Upanisads are absolutely one of my favorite pieces of writing just glad to share :+) hm I don't know of that particular version, but I will say my favorites are the Candogya and the Brhadaranyaka, both are in the Olivelle OUP edition.

The S. Radhakrishnan one, my b lol. It's also got pretty decent commentary, a bit heavy on the comparisons to Christianity but it's solid.

>>2375427
thanks dude for taking the time to reply, really appreciate it.