how the fuck are you supposed to know if you're hallucinating?
should i just assume that 100% of the time?
>know
Pragmatic truth is literally all that matters for most people
>>2338863
beyond reasonable doubt, fact-based analysis
>>2338863
Yawn read Descartes, then Kant and Husserl.
>>2338863
One thing I remember from taking hallucinogenic drugs, is that you can hallucinate all sort of crazy shit and still be very aware that its hallucinations and that there is an objective reality underneath your hallucinations.
This leads me to believe that we would find out if we really were hallucinating all the time.
>>2338863
I usually introduce a knife to the kidney whenever I find someone like you.
"Psssh, it's just a hallucination"
>>2338863
You're only hallucinating if you're observing a phenomenon that either disproves scientific concepts/princinples/theories that are widely accepted by academia as the objective truth of our reality, or if you're observing a phenomenon that isn't covered under our current knowledge of the natural world and therefore requires addmiting that we just don't know everything.
:^)
>not reading Hume
>not being a radical skepticist
Never gonna make it