Why did he do it? Why did he have to go and solve Philosophy?

*solve* that's a pretty spooky thing to say.

>>2318760
>implying Wittgenstein didn't actually win philosophy.

Actually I solved philosophy last Summer but I'm not telling anyone the solution lol >:)

>>2318760
what are you talking about? he just has opinions on what an idealized human is. he even declares they are opinions.

if you want to look up the closest things to the "solvers" of philosophy, get into the phenomenologists. existentialists are more akin to inspirational speakers.

>>2318760
why can't he fuck that ubermensh in that pussy nigger man I wish he undersodd that stinrer meme mam is bettter than a cloiud on ice tohsaka

File: 34562.png (994KB, 893x859px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 893x859px

>>2319904

File: 1482813281509.jpg (52KB, 688x726px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 688x726px

>>2318760
Do people seriously think he has written anything more insightful than Stirner?

>>2318760
It really depress me to see how right he was. Nowadays, ressentiment is everywhere, and if you're an autoproclamed opressed minoritiy, you're automatically right. Women, homosexuals, black people are all oppressed by priviledged white cis mâle. It's really depressing.

His whole vision, of the will to power and all that, he imposed that grandiose vision on himself because he was a pitiful invalid. Its whole basis is false, nonexistent. His work is an unspeakable megalomania. His most authentic work is his letters, because in them he’s truthful, while in his other work he’s prisoner to his vision. In his letters one sees that he’s just a poor guy, that he’s ill, exactly the opposite of everything he claimed.

File: dcd9b06fddb85e16c1e19981df288772.jpg (18KB, 377x480px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 377x480px

>>2320373
The "will of power" is an existential philosophy about how to overcome oneself by constant improvement, from a pragmatic and positivist point of view, this philosophy is the best one to live a fulfilling existence.

Now, you can disagree with him, but calling him names and dismissing his work the same way doesn't allow me of others to understand what or why you find to be wrong/false in particular.

Now I've seen some people make comments like yours, who retort back something along the lines of "why is Nietzsche right?" or some variation to shift the burden of proof unto others, since you are criticising Nietzsche's work I've assume that you like some of us here have read his complete works, so we have base knowledge, if you are going to create a new argument to disprove him you need to give us your thoughts/logic so we can agree or disagree.

I've laid the fundamentals of what "Will of power" is, but this is not Nietzsche's hole argument about the will, since he also in a more deep level he discussed about the "free will" the "being" and "existence".

>>2319890
42