>tfw no global superstate

>>2310247
Who would be in charge of it?

>>2310249
me

>>2310249
Monarchy with enatic-cognatic succession.

>>2310265
>Monarchy

>>2310249
Donald Trump

>>2310247
>Mexico

>>2310247
Why Greenland, South Africa, and Japan?

>>2310660
Also, why Mexico?

Really, it should just be the UK, the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

>>2310842
Their vassal-states can be officially independent.

>>2310660
>>2310842
>Mexico provides a small southern border that is easy to defend
>Greenland for that aesthetic appeal
South Africa and japan so a standing army can be placed anywhere in Africa or asia at a moments notice

>>2310854
But what would we do with the people in those countries?
I mean, 65% of Anglos would be fine with reuniting, and 30% would get over it.
These others would cause civil unrest for centuries.
And we'd have such a great navy, anyway, so why would we need land in Asia and Africa? We could just have military bases, like we do, now.

>tfw no one world, non race based, traditional gender roles, individualist meritocratic authoritarian goverment.

>>2310956
>Australia joins into a massive global superstae
> Tasmania isn't part of it

Actually, not sure why I'm greentexting. Seems plausible enough.

File: image.jpg (7KB, 217x232px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 217x232px

>tfw there are states

>>2311006
isn't Tasmania just a huge fucking reserve for a single animal?