>Perfect youtube philosophers don't exi-

I tried looking this up and nothing came up.
Who?

>>2305184
InspiringPhilisophy

>>2305197
literally shit

File: IMG_1242.png (60KB, 208x206px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 208x206px

>>2305224

>>2305197
Total cancer.

>>2305224
>>2305246
>fedora
>>2305041
He's got some good stuff but it would be better if he did Presuppositional apologetics. Natural theology is also objectively cancer.

>videos in defense of the ontological argument
Jesus, man. I hate to pull a Current Year, but come on. This shit's been refuted to hell and back.

>>2305275
>Natural theology is also objectively cancer.
Fedora.

>>2305275
>Presuppositional apologetics
mindless fundie spotted. I've seen him talk over a video by Evid3nc3 and he missed about every point he made. but as awful it was, at least he didn't stupe to the level of presuppositional apologetics

File: laughing putin.gif (4MB, 347x244px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 347x244px

>>2305275
>it would be better if he did Presuppositional apologetics.

File: not an argument .jpg (20KB, 720x533px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 720x533px

>>2305311
>>2305324

>>2305342
indeed, presuppositional apologetics isn't an argument