How does one complete the system of German Idealism?

>>2297940

An extra chromosome.

File: image.jpg (337KB, 843x1024px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 843x1024px

How can you complete what was already destroyed?

By going back in time and having 1848 succeed

Is Nietzsche an idealist? Actually, on that note, is Spinoza an idealist (I know he isn't German)?

>>2297940
Arthur is shit tier take him off

>>2297940
You go full Materialism. German Idealism and what followed are without a doubt the most destructive force in the universe.

>>2298972
But going full materialism is exactly what made its successor into what it was.

develop autism

Pass on Hegel if you wish to remain a sane individual

>>2297940
Don't worry about that, Trump will complete it soon.

>>2297940
What is missing?

>>2299989
What is trump synthesis of

File: image.jpg (21KB, 200x290px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 200x290px

>>2298955

Because...?

>>2299890
Hegel's philosophy: "If no one can comprehend what the fuck I'm writing, people will think I'm smart!"

>>2297940
By raising Thule

>>2298952
>Is Nietzsche an idealist?
Big question. Very contentious. You'll definitely see parallels with Nietzsche's perspectivism and idealism but he's so scathing about previous idealists that most people separate them. I'll quote the Stanford Encyclopaedia:

>It may seem far-fetched to think of Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) as an idealist. After all, he presented himself as an almost fanatical anti-idealist throughout his life. In many of his published and unpublished writings as well as in his letters he expresses over and again his dislike and his disdain for what he calls “idealism.” A telling summary of his position concerning idealism is to be found in his letter to Malvida von Meysenburg (October 20, 1888): “and I treat idealism as untruthfulness that has become an instinct, a not-wanting-to-see reality at any price: every sentence of my writings contains contempt for idealism”. This harsh assessment is by no means easy to understand given his known sympathies with a perspectival approach to objects of cognition, his insistence that falsification or tampering (Verfälschung) is at the basis of most of our cognitive judgments, and his claims as to the dependence of knowledge on needs. Considerations like these suggest that in spite of his protests, idealistic modes of thinking are not alien to Nietzsche. At least some of his beliefs are compatible with what has been called here epistemological idealism although Nietzsche himself would have taken these beliefs to express a form of realism.

>>2298955
Hes the only decent one there

>>2303718
This

>>2303718
>>2303880
Your logical fallacy is personal incredulity

Because you found something difficult to understand, or are unaware of how it works, you made out like it's probably not true.

>>2303906
>>2303906
>write nonsense dressed in incomprehensible prose
>people complain
>"you just don't understand it!!!"
you can defend anything by that strategy
don't like my "artwork" consisting of feces smeared on a flag?
you just don't understand it!!!
personal incredulity!!!

>>2303906
Oh fuck off, he's the most overrated philosopher ever, he's the equivalent of those mystical "guru" New age buffons we have today

>>2298950
The world would be a much better place.

>>2303906
>>2303910
>>2303943
I will give Hegel one more chance this year. I'll prep up with introductory books first, but if I can't understand it I'll drop him. Nothing against (or for) the philosopher. I just don't need this in my life. If I wanted to read an incomprehensible book I'll just go to Joyce or Becket, because they at least have some aesthetic value.

Schopenhauer on the other hand, what prose, what clarity of thought, aims and expression! Every philosopher should aspire to write like Schopenhauer.

idealism is the greatest cancer in philosophy

File: 1485519342858.jpg (29KB, 460x349px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 460x349px

>>2297940

Can't beat 'em

>>2304376

http://4archive.org/board/lit/thread/8627576