Is there anything profound, or at least well thought out, in what he says?
When you cut through the esoteric jargon and name dropping of Lacan and whomever else, is there anything of substance?
he looked pretty dumb and obscurantist in that al Jazeera (or was it BBC can't remember) interview where he pussyfooted around supporting Trump
His interview with rt where he started talking about castrations after Castro's death (Castro = castration) was fucking weird too
I think Chomsky was right in calling him a chucklefuck which he is 75% of the time
>>2295784
>Chomsky
Not even a real anarchist, just a liberal who's a self proclaimed genius on every topic in existence.
>>2295773
The trashcan of ideology stuff is pretty accurate desu.
He suffers from what all post modern philosophers do
Use inhouse jargon that the uninitiated will not understand in order to sound complex and deep.
Post modern philo is utter garbage and mostly just navel gazing.
>>2295841
>I don't understand philosophy so it's stupid!
>>2295773
His critique of modern 'leftist' dogma is interesting considering that the left in Europe and the 'left' in America are dying
Also read First A Tradegy, I thought it was quite interesting
>>2295874
I like him but he does spout some weird shit just for headlines from time to time.
>>2295887
>left is dying
Most under 30 are highly sympathetic of Bernie. Within 30-40 years his thinking will be the norm, maybe the far left commies will die out but that I doubt
>>2295940
Young people are usually left leaning, they just vote less