>by the Grace of God, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias, of Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod, Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Poland, Tsar of Siberia, Tsar of Tauric Chersonesos, Tsar of Georgia, Lord of Pskov, andGrand Duke of Smolensk, Lithuania, Volhynia, Podolia, and Finland, Prince of Estonia, Livonia, Courland and Semigalia, Samogitia,Belostok, Karelia, Tver, Yugra, Perm, Vyatka, Bulgaria and other territories; Lord and Grand Duke of Nizhni Novgorod, Sovereign of Chernigov, Ryazan, Polotsk, Rostov, Yaroslavl, Beloozero, Udoria, Obdoria, Kondia, Vitebsk, Mstislavl, and all northern territories; Sovereign of Iberia, Kartalinia, and the Kabardinian lands and Armenian territories - hereditary Lord and Ruler of the Circassians and Mountain Princes and others; Lord of Turkestan, Heir of Norway, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Dithmarschen,Oldenburg, and so forth, and so forth, and so forth
So was Russia like the HRE, a bunch of states united by a common dick up their ass autocrat?
>>2294650
>So was Russia like the HRE
And many other Empires formed out of conquest of foreign land - China, Rome, Persia, etc,
>>2294859
The Ottoman Sultan wasn't tzar of Bulgaria or king of Georgia.
The British King wasn't chief of the Iroquois or sultan of Egypt.
>>2294650
Russia was a feudal state until 1905, HRE was the least feudal state in the middle ages
>>2294650
If Nicky was grand duke of Bulgaria, why did he go to war with Bulgaria?
Was the nort-east Balkan front a Russian civil war?
>>2294650
>Duke of Schleswig-Holstein
nicky owned a part of germany?
>>2294900
And a heir to the Norwegian throne, apparently.
I wonder what would've happened to Sweden since Nicky owned Finland and Norway, sandwiching it.
>>2294915
You can't take those titels to serious, Otto von Habsburg was aparently King of Jesrusalem
>>2294900
It's just a title, the Austrian emperors were kings of Jerusalem without owning it ffs