What is historical context behind so heavy Sub-Saharan Negro

Interbreeding with Roman and Moorish negro slaves?

>>2279635
Slave trade and womens BBC fetish.

>>2279635
Slavery. Jews and s.euros would import blacks from sub Saharan to use as house slaves and flaunt there wealth. Italians are a horny lot and a good amount of them probably vecked their female black slaves.

>>2280107
I think it was the other way around as indications are that it was Etruscan, Berber and Roman males to knock up slave women Jefferson style
>BBC
Broadcasting didn't exist back then

>>2279635
I call bullshit. I'm Calabrese and took a DNA test. 0%sub Saharan DNA. I had 15% west Asian so obviously my ancestors got around.

File: BBC.jpg (122KB, 624x605px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 624x605px

>>2280119
>BBC
was a thing back then

File: BBC_roman.jpg (131KB, 510x594px)

131KB, 510x594px

>>2280184
Face it, black man are made to breed, white boys cannot compete

>>2280143
>I call bullshit. I'm Calabrese and took a DNA test. 0%sub Saharan DNA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM

>>2280143
>it's bullshit because one guy doesn't fit data with a large sample size
Study completely debunked!

>>2280184
It's not big statistically so to speak. Trust me Europeans fucked whatever they good.

>>2279635

the Hebrews were black.

>>2280300
[citation needed]
DNA test, logistic possibility and historical evidence.

>>2280332

so called white devil

albino finna bow before black KINGS

>>2279635
Its literary the same reasons Dixie Americans have 1-2% Negro blood. South West Europe (Spain, Portuagal, the Italian city states, and Jew) were partakers of the Black slave trade.

>>2280370

does it stand to reason then that Arabs have a similar sub-Saharan admixture?

Or did their practice of castrating all the male slaves prevent this effect?

File: IMG_1770.png (26KB, 192x191px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 192x191px

>>2279635
>African Americans
>Only 70% African
It's funny because it makes all the black supremacist movements look even more retarded

>>2280393
all supremacist movements are retarded.

>>2279635
>moor fucks a kang
>generations later his ancestor fucks an iberia
really makes you think.....

>>2280392
>does it stand to reason then that Arabs have a similar sub-Saharan admixture?
They probably have more. remember though that Arab is a broad grouping such as Slav or Germanic. Some Arabs have more than others, some Arab people are just other ethnic groups assimilated into being Arabs for whatever reason.

>there are people who seriously believe ancient peoples would care about racial purity or some shit

>>2280419

>he thinks they didn't

GREAT

HAN

>>2280300
WE

>>2279635
It could be a variety of reasons, but mostly it's ancient admixture. Or shared alleles because of closer genetic proximity. It's definitely not the absurd reason the nation of yahweh put forward - a sign that the ancient hebrews were black. Mizrahi jews/sephardi jews have less ssa admixture than their host populations.

>>2280143
Most personal genomics tests show recent history.

File: thinking-face.png (53KB, 256x256px)

53KB, 256x256px

>>2280444
Or maybe all the documents and first hand accounts are true and Jews from Iberia had disproportion involvement with slave trading and moor buggery?

>>2280444
>a sign that the ancient hebrews were black
[citation needed]

>>2280513
You'd probably be right, if all those documents and first hand accounts existed.

>>2280517
http://www.rense.com/general69/invo.htm

>>2280370
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I recall studies showing Southern Whites were actually surprisingly white with only 8% having any admixture at all.

>>2280392

The Arabs are basically everything. They're the Spanish of the ME.

>>2280542
You figure Portugal and South Italy (the two largest European groups with Black African DNA not counting Jews) supposedly have 2.1 and 1.1% Black DNA.

In South Carolina and Louisiana, the White population has 8% Black DNA. Geographically speaking that's a larger plot of land than S Italy and Portugal which are rather small areas of land.

>>2280513
Okay.

>>2280515
A citation for what exactly - that the ancient hebrews were black or that they weren't?

File: Egypt Race.gif (74KB, 381x257px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 381x257px

>>2280444
WE

File: IMG_5199.png (492KB, 936x966px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 936x966px

>>2280400
Sure thing

>>2279635
How is 1-4% "heavy"?

>>2280614
It isn't. If you discount Jews the highest nation is Portugal which is 2.1%. That's remarkable small actually.

>>2280614
It's pretty much makes you unEuropean

>>2280614
I think that OP means that it's pretty heavy CENTURIES after
>>2280117
>>2280103
>>2280184
some individual cases of interbreeding. We don't have the evidence of massive interbreeding as far as my knowledge goes

>>2280792
Portugal BTFO.

>Negro

Why do cousinfuckers insist on talking like 19th century newsmen?

>>2281290
Negro was used in America until the 80s. Still antiquated, but not as much as you think.

>>2281290
Because it's a scientific racial term even Reagan used? Mo Ali used, Malcolm X used.

>>2281290
>cousinfuckers
Slander. The most inbred people are Arabs, Pakistanis, kurds and Jews

>>2281290
woah, nothing wrong with fucking your cousin, bigot

>>2280606
But they are, are you personally to be commended for your own personal ancestors' achievements by some kind of genetic magic awards show?

>>2281479
Collective ethnic solidarity starts bothering you, when it's not affirmative actions and quota placement, huh, Jamal Melanino?

>>2281509
No, you /pol/ack, I understand that patriotism is useful and nice. The point still stands, try to make an argument.

>>2280393

They should feel the most guilty about slavery since they have more slave owner blood running through their veins than your average white

>>2281479
>they are
The world as you know is a product of European supremacists. Dmitry Mendeleev, Cecil Rhodes, Winston Churchill, Christophor Columbus, Richard Wagner. You name it.

>>2281538
This. European supremacism and purism is a norm

Confused negro here. Did we breed them or were we bred?