Why is the Out Of Africa hypothesis controversial on this board?

because of the implications it comes with.

>>2274522

Because we have a significant /pol/ influx

Is it really? I've never seen seen anyone who also believes in evolution claim that humans didn't come from Africa.

>>2274525
What are the implications that come with it?

>>2274552

Let me guess...it does not conform to biblical literalism?

File: thatsracist.gif (478KB, 265x236px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 265x236px

Oh you know why! Don't be like that. You know exactly why.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color#Evolution_of_skin_color

>1. From about 1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, archaic humans, including archaic Homo sapiens, were dark-skinned.
>2. As Homo sapiens populations began to migrate, the evolutionary constraint keeping skin dark decreased proportionally to the distance north a population migrated, resulting in a range of skin tones within northern populations.
>3. At some point, some northern populations experienced positive selection for lighter skin due to the increased production of vitamin D from sunlight and the genes for darker skin disappeared from these populations.
>4. Subsequent migrations into different UV environments and admixture between populations have resulted in the varied range of skin pigmentations we see today.

>>2274568
Legit don't understand how anybody on this planet could be triggered by this

>>2274535
This

>muh Thule

>>2274522
/pol/ can't accept they are descendants from blacks.

File: Albino Blacks.jpg (92KB, 600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 600x1000px

>>2274568
So at what point does a group of people become different from another group of people? Its clear Eurasians aren't the same as Blacks to anyone with cognitive ability.

>>2274806
>thinks Whites evolved from Black people
>Somehow endearing towards Blacks

>>2274807
>Its clear Eurasians aren't the same as Blacks to anyone with cognitive ability.
Eurasians aren't even the same as other Eurasians

>>2274813
Hello Jack Chick, aren't you dead?

Does the theory that Americans are descended from Brits also mean that Americans are more evolved than Brits are?

>>2274816
>Eurasians aren't even the same as other Eurasians
Exactly. It doesn't matter if we come from a root race. Its clear people have diverged into distinct groups over the span of thousands of years. This included the differences between Black Africans such as Bantu, Pygmys, khoisans, Blackmoors and Ethopics.

>>2274821
>descended
Natural selection creating a group of people more adapted to their environment is evolution.

>>2274522

I have no idea

Either a group of our distant ancestors evolved close to current homo sapians and then migrated or we migrated out before, evolved a bit and then came back to Africa to later mix with the species that stayed.

In either scenario we originally left Africa, changed and mixed with other hominid species. Most famously neanderthals but some others also exist..

>>2274883
>neanderthals
They existed in North Africa also.

Geographically, North Africa is Mediterranean.

>>2274522
It isn't?

>>2274914
We've remembered/discovered so many into Africa events since that retarded theory was "devised", it is becoming a massive controversy.

>>2274923
Buddy, you can't just call it retarded and abandon thread. Where exactly do you think humans came from? Who besides you and your hugbox thinks OOA is controversial?

>>2274958
> http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

There's literally a search engine you use.

>>2274806

We aren't, tho. OP's pic doesn't show the migration of modern humans from the rift valley into the rest of Africa, but that last common ancestor was not "black", he was the ancestor of all "black" and "white" races. The extreme darkness of negro Africans is a later adaptation, our last common ancestor would have been swarthy, not "black".

>>2274968
>>2274969
So basically >>2274806

Thanks.

>>2274975

I'm not "/pol/", I have no problem with being descended from niggers but in fact we are not. No doubt this "/pol/" fellow would consider our last common ancestor to be a mudblood or coon of some kind, but the fact remains that he wasn't.

File: Wild and Tame.jpg (248KB, 750x1090px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 750x1090px

>>2274976
If you're talking about me, Blacks are inbred for 1000s of years, Caucasoids are not and thus have tamer features.

>>2274982
Everyone has been inbreeding since that first humans.

>>2274522
>/his/
>actually knowing history

File: intredasting.jpg (51KB, 685x567px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 685x567px

>>2275011

>>2274522
>implying this board isn't just an extenstion of /pol/ citing whatever scraps of history they can that reaffirms their political ideology rather than any actual academic interest in history

Confirmation Bias: The Board

Anything that is remotely political is completely shit on this board.
We should just discuss ancient weapons and stuff.

File: fedora.jpg (38KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1280x720px

>>2275150
Exactly. We should seek to avoid "Politicized" "History" (TM). You know, statements like "black people are humans, too" or "some people may be critical of Nazi war crimes."

>>2275150
What you need to do anon is just laugh. These people don't want to learn or listen, so don't bother. Just laugh at them. Once they piss off, then we discuss such things.

>>2275186
wew, thanks for proving my point

Wait, I am genuinely confused by the responses in this thread. Is it the Marxists or the racists that are denying the out-of-Africa hypothesis?

>>2274806
>descendants from blacks.
Do you libtards realize you are actually making a case for blacks being subhuman retards compared to white people BY CALLING THEM OUR ANCIENT ANCESTORS?

>>2275345
>modern day blacks are identical to ancient blacks
what's your iq again?

File: arse.gif (469KB, 480x228px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 480x228px

>>2275345
They're literally saying that Blacks are 40,000 year old Kindergarteners.

>>2275362
The point is you are calling black people living fossisl you moron.

>>2275330

What the fuck does marx have to do with this?

No one is making any comment related to it.

This board is fucking awful.

>>2275393
>this reading comprehension
ancient blacks are the ancestors of humanity =/= modern blacks are living fossils

>>2275398
>marx
The pejorative accusation "marxist" goes beyond his original ideas that describe class conflict and have evolved, in /pol/itical circles, to describe ideas attributed by them to left leaning thinkers or institutions.

>>2274522

It isnt.

FUCK OFF

>>2275375
if he "literally" said that you should be able to quote it pretty easily then shouldnt you ;)

>>2275011
Damn...

>>2274522
When will Homo Sapiens Sapiens apologize for the Neanderthal genocide?

>>2275065
>
Stupidity: Your post

>>2274522
>Why is the Out Of Africa hypothesis controversial on this board?
>on this board
It's controversial to anyone that upholds even the slightest amount of dignity to their academic work.

>>2275398
It's /pol/. It contaminates everything and ruins it.
Way too many teenagers with nothing better to do.

>>2278094
/pol/fag here. I hate these guys who throw words around as much as you do. A lot of them are teenage anglos who don't actually use critical thinking, thus them doing things like "uh hurr stupid Marxist!" Because you had a different political opinion than them.
It's okay, buddy. There is no /pol/ boogieman, just Anglo teenagers.
Sincerely, a right-wing man

>>2278100
Read lesswrong blog, please. You dont dissapoint.

File: 1435748442728.jpg (188KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1462x1462px

>>2274813
>>2274830
>>2275345
>>2275375
>>2275409
>/pol/ thinks evolution is like in Pokémon