Has the United States been a positive influence on South America?

>>2262564
>Venezuela
>No US intervention
I guess failed interventions don't count?

>>2262564
Perhaps as a trading partner, but not as a military force.

>>2262564
We totally did intervene in Nicaragua and Haiti. And these were objective positives for those countries, so not sure why they're being excluded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_occupation_of_Haiti#Government_and_opposition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_occupation_of_Nicaragua

>>2262564
>no us intervention in Haiti

>>2262617
>>2262647

It's nice that they lied so blatantly right off the bat so you can discard whatever they have to say without having to waste precious minutes.

Pretty much setting up horrible dictatorships, and using them for their own interests. Don't think they did too much good.

>>2262564

>The US didn't intervene in El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, or Haiti

Are you actually this stupid?

>>2262942
Yeah, when I took history of Latin America in college, it was basically an outline of how each country ran itself and it usually at some point reached "and then the US came in and fucked shit up". It's a pretty largely ignored part of world history, Latin America has some really dope stuff in it's history.