Did he do nothing wrong?
>>2256877
>an Imperial Grand Admiral
>nothing wrong
>>2256877
Iran was the ninth richest country in the world under him, with a dwelling middle class and rights with women in line with or even beyond contemporary western nations.
Compare that to now.
his father was better
>>2256877
Did nothing wrong? He let a bunch of towel heads over throw him instead of killing them all!
Seriously, he ran away like a fucking dog.
>>2256877
He was just another US puppet tyrant.
>>2258636
Most Iranians were poor and but conservative (and still are). The pictures you see on Iranian women in the 1970s, were the urban elite who don't represent the majority.
>>2259030
Trump doesn't want to start a religious dictatorship.
Does /pol/ support this guy?
>>2259100
>expanded rights to women and minorities
>expanded trade
>liberalized economy
>sensible economic policy
Nah
>>2259100
No, because the Ayatollah is typically credited as the forefront of anti-Zionism so anything he opposes is naturally bad, although /pol/'s views of these sorts of things are beginning to shift.
>>2258909
this. his father was extremely based. would've made iran into a secular country if not for the (((eternal anglo))) ousting him from power for wanting to remain neutral in ww2
>>2259100
/pol/ is typically pro-Iran (past and present) from what I've seen
>>2259100
Yes, he is basically sandnigger Pinochet.
The regressive left has a short memory. The Shah was hated by leftist "intellectuals", and when he was deposed leftists worldwide rejoiced and celebrated the Ayatollah as some kind of muslim socialist.
>>2259081
Replace religion with nationalism and it's the same thing.
>>2259305
Replace nationalism with rye bread and parmesan and you have a sandwich.
>>2259366
rye bread and parmesan aren't ideologies.
Now I need a sandwich.
>>2259104
>Expanded rights to Minorities
>by Shitting on Anyone who wasn't persian
>>2256877
Shooting and torturing people,maybe?
>>2256877
Literally did nothing wrong. The Assad of the 1970s