Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Author Opinion and Ranking thread 2017-01-18 04:28:50 Post No. 2240216
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Author Opinion and Ranking thread 2017-01-18 04:28:50 Post No. 2240216
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1484347449807.jpg (116KB, 736x475px) Image search:
[Google]
116KB, 736x475px
I don't think I've ever seen a thread dedicated to discussing the quality, reliability, and overall objectiveness/subjectiveness of authors/scholars/historians here.
I'll start with Toby Wilkinson. Is he as good as the publishers acclaim him to be in the subject of Egyptology?
Pic somewhat related
>>
>>2240216
>Thoth-posting
Get thee behind me, heretic. This is Kekist territory.
>>
File: 1483975141825.jpg (343KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
343KB, 1000x1000px
>>2240249
Sorry, to atone, I will post Kek too.
Each have their own place, however.
>>
>>2240216
>Toby Wilkinson
never heard of him, to me the two scholars who matter the most in Egyptology is Kenneth A Kitchen and Donald Redford
>>
>>2240216
> a thread dedicated to discussing the quality, reliability, and overall objectiveness/subjectiveness of authors/scholars/historians
Too meta for my tastes.
>>
>discussing historians
Unless it's WWII, you're fucked.
>>
File: 1484713730127-01.jpg (149KB, 736x475px)
149KB, 736x475px
>>2240693
Unfortunately, this
/thread
>>
>>2240253
Where is the place for Horus, then?
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3