English language

Diacritical marks are needed

>>2231206
>ß
Ss rarely occurs in orthography and it's not phonemic. It can just be dropped.

>ч
Why introduce some esoteric slavrune when we can just use 'c' for 'ch'.

>>2231221
Cart and cart. One of these is something you carry things in, the other is a visual way of representing data.

>>2231229
Yes but under the new system, it'd be Kart and Cart respectively.

Tho to reeducate the public on a new system is thankless work, and the less changes the made to fix english, the better.

If naything needs an overhaul, it's sanskrit, mandarin, and finnish.

>>2231206
I suppose it is doable since English has some really lame rules to make it look more like Latin.

But personally prefer language to evolve organically.

>>2231315
implying the way you write a language has anything to do with its actual evolution

>>2231318
Sure I am not aware it ever did, but nowadays it does.

>>2231321
Explain.

>>2231323
>Explain.
Well, I am still wrong, since it only really applies to chatroom and messaging.
I admit to be wrong.

>>2231315
>since English has some really lame rules to make it look more like Latin.
No one seriously follows those. The participle rule is also a great way to spot people you know you won't like.

>>2231341
I do not even remember what it exactly was, Steven Pinker mentioned it once, in a video I think.

I think it had to do with grammar.

>>2231318
The way a language is written is still something that develops and changes naturally over time

How about for just þis þread we use þose?