>>2210475
>I AM
I've already explained 'I AM' in >>2208376.
Look anon, if A=X, B=X and C=X, then A=B=C, right?
No, D came to destroy the party. If D=X, then A=B=C=D. Then it not Trinity anymore.
Example:
Exodus 7:1;
...LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh...
2 Corinthians 4:4:
Satan, who is the god of this world, ....
Hebrew 7
2 ...Melchizedek first being by interpretation “king of righteousness,” and after that also king of Salem, which means “king of peace.”
3 Without father, without mother and without descent, having neither beginning of days nor end of life
Psalm 82:6
I have said, Ye are gods...
>power to resurrect and give life
Kings 13:21
...When the body(dead) touched Elisha's bones, the man came to life...
>Jesus forgave sins
What? He only told 'Your sins are forgiven', NOT 'I forgave your sins'. There's a big difference.
There's also counterpart verse where Jesus disclaiming divinity, like here >>2208468,
See the importance of having a verse that it close to saying that those three are one? You need a pillar to support the Trinity concept, but you haven't got that.
Besides, Trinity is confusing, which contradict 1 Corinthians 14:33:
For God is not the author of confusion...
"IT'S NOT CONFUSING"
"Tch, what is the Council of Nicea? What is hundreds of bishops debating about 'What is Jesus?'?"
>>2215003
If the person I'm replying to see this, please just respond, don't have to be an argument.
Oh, and I'm gonna bump this thread two times just to make sure that guy sees this. I'm also not in the mood of keeping this thread alive.
I may or may not reply to you anons if you're making a valid argument, if there's any.
First bump
https://youtu.be/KQLfgaUoQCw
Obligatory
"Learn, therefore," says the writer, "that Abraham who first appointed circumcision, looked forward in spirit unto Jesus when he circumcised, having received the ordinances of three letters. For the Scripture saith, And Abraham circumcised of his household eighteen males and three hundred.' What then was the knowledge given unto him? Understand ye that He saith the eighteen' first, and then after an interval three hundred.' In the [number] eighteen [the Greek IOTA] stands for 10, [the Greek ETA] for eight. Here thou hast Jesus ([in Greek] IESOUS). And because the cross in the [Greek TAU] was to have grace, he saith also three hundred.' So he revealeth Jesus in two letters and in the remaining one the cross".[5]
>>2216196
What?
>>2216165
*slap*
Don't be rude
> If D=X, then A=B=C=D. Then it not Trinity anymore.
Technicaly, it is four Trinities,
A=B=C, A=B=D, A=C=D, B=C=D
Christianity isn't true anyway so whats the point of arguing about the nature of your three made up gods
Last attempt to show the anon in OP my response.
Don't say I didn't deliver.
I may or may not reply to you anons if you're making a valid argument, if there's any. As I'm not in the mood right now.
>>2217505
Oh, but I will read your valid argument