Has anyone tried Dianetics and did it work for you?
>>2195309
its pretty much the same thing as gurdieff and a bunch of other system that see man as a thing made of parts/aspects that dont work together, but then they will teach you how to do this right if you serve/pay/obey them
it all 'works' you just have to do a lot of selfsuggestion
Yes. i tried it. I became enlightened and returned here.
>>2195847
We shouldn't have either to be honest
I wouldn´t past the lie detector thing
>>2195855
Eh, hard to see a board they'd be better suited to. /b/, obviously, but outside that /his/ and /lit/ both seem on-topic for religion threads.
>>2195893
They should just allow the more serious theology threads to be posted here. Lazy shit like this should fuck off to /x/
>>2195965
Who is to decide what's serious and what's not? You? This is the same problem as this "fake news" foolishness, one man's shitpost is another's thoughtnugget, and some of the best threads I've been in started out as moronic trolls.
>>2195977
>Who is to decide what's serious and what's not?
>Who is to decide what's a good age of consent?
>Who is to decide what's a reasonable speed limit?
You set arbitrary but useful parameters like the ones that allow society to somewhat function irl and any non-aspie retard accept as necessary
>You?
No, in this case the janitor (pbuh)
>>2196027
I don't believe in this supposed "janitor", I've never seen him, and I've never heard a good case for him existing. Your so-called "rules" are just a mechanism of social control put in place to serve the interests of the reptillian ruling class, free your memes, man.
>>2196056
Rumour has it mentioning filled pastries is the only way to summon him