Is sex a human right?

>>2189291
Human rights is subjective I am sure people could decide it just depends on the culture and society I suppose

>>2189291
If you're Chad

Didn't Jeremy Corbyn say something about this?

in a humane society prostitutes would be subsidized

but of course chad and stacy oppose this

>>2189291
How do you enforce this? If nobody wants to fuck you, you can't make them without infringing on their rights.

Can't work. Not a right.

>>2189291
No, it is the criteria by which your genes are judged for continued existence. Were it considered a human right, a basic mechanism of natural selection would be removed from our arsenal, and humanity would be worse off for it. Also it would violate the right to self determination pretty damned hard. Also fuck off back to >>/r9k/

Yes, if all the women decided not to have kids the human race would die off and we can't allow that to happen as humans have not yet served their purpose.

It is only because women are such sloots that this moral conundrum has never come up.

Sex purely for pleasure? That is not a right. Buy a fleshlight you worthless beta.

>>2189331
>sex always results in your genes passing on or has to

no

>>2189347
>implying existence has a purpose

File: wise muslim cleric.jpg (26KB, 700x405px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 700x405px

>>2189349
If sex does not result in the passing on of one's genes, then either you have been sinful and committed sodomy, or, the test has been conducted and you do not fit the criteria for the passing on of one's seed.

>>2189291

Sex doesn't mean anything without intimacy

>Seinfeld provides an example of a schizoid woman who would covertly attend various bars to meet men for the purpose of gaining impersonal sexual gratification, an act which alleviated her feelings of hunger and emptiness.

>>2189331

>a basic mechanism of natural selection would be removed from our arsenal

Like rape and murder?

What about pathogens and disease?

>>2189291
Sex is a negative right, i.e. you always have the right to not have sex.

>>2189291
People don't need sex.

File: seizethemeansofreproduction.png (245KB, 394x395px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 394x395px

>>2189291
Of course not OP, the means of reproduction must be seized.

>>2189331
>Were it considered a human right, a basic mechanism of natural selection would be removed from our arsenal, and humanity would be worse off for it.

Except female choice of partners has been evaded by rape since forever

>>2190132
Not as a rule but exception. Unlike what you might believe, most women are perfectly willing to reproduce, and most men aren't capable of actually raping.

Death is the only human right.

>>2189291
Human rights are a spook.

File: swimming refugees cartoon.jpg (573KB, 1247x1774px) Image search: [Google]

573KB, 1247x1774px

>>2190020
warning, sexual emergency imminent

>>2189291
Human rights are a spook.

>>2189326
How is ANYTHING a human right by that criteria? Any other right can only exist if you're willing to violate other people's rights to guarantee that right.

>>2190394
females are a spook

>>2190394
>>2190402
It's just spooks all the way down.