Why did peace treaties seemingly get suddenly harsher in the

>>2187158
>but Austria had barely any punishment.
Are you kidding? Never heard about a place called Silesia, right?

Why open threads like this, if you are not interested in the topic at all?
/his/ is flooded with these kind of threads, where its only an OP and nothing else.

>>2187158
>For example, Austria and France lost the 7 years war but Austria had barely any punishment.

Brit detected
The Seven Years War in Europe was truly lost by Prussia
The only reason they didnt get punisged is because the Russian Tsar loved them
Brits need to realize the shitty skirmish in North America in which they took a decade to defeat severely outnumbered frogs =/= the real Seven Years War

If you wanted a good exemple, you could have mentioned how Austria attacked France three times between 1798 and 1809 and ended up with French troops marching in Vienna each time, yet Napoleon never felt like deposing their emperor

>>2187395
>ahhahahahahah you think france EVER lost a war?

Oh fuck off. I'm Australian anyway, not British. Secondly, the Austrians did not regain Silesia. The War is in every sense of the word a miserable failure for Austria.

>>2187395
>Austria attacked France three times between 1798 and 1809 and ended up with French troops marching in Vienna each tim
Only the last two times, though they probably would have been if the First Coalition War had continued.

>>2187427
Yes Austria lost the war because they couldnt retake Silesia, but at the same time Prussia should have collapsed and its a miracle that they somehow survived through pure tsarist magic, while Vienna or Prague or Budapest or Milan was at no point (i think) seriously threatened by Frederick